Users
Two hundred and twelve adults in heterosexual relationships (106 women, Myears = years; 106 men, Mage age = years) and two kissbrides.com internet hundred and eight adults in same-gender relationships (72 couples self-identified as gay: Mage = 34.1 years; 72 couples self-identified as lesbian: Mage = 33.3 years years). Couples were required to have been together romantically for a minimum of 6 months and to come to the lab with their partner to participate in the study. The average relationship length for all couples was 4.8 years (SD = 6.6 years). Exclusion criteria limited participation to individuals currently without serious, chronic health problems or any health issues (e.g., diabetes) that affected their eating behaviors. (If participants engaged in disordered eating behaviors but did not conceptualize them as disordered, they may have participated).
The participants in heterosexual dating was predominantly Western european American (72% Eu American, 10% Ebony, 8% Hispanic/Latino, 7% Asian Western, and you may 3% “other”). Users reported private revenues inside range: “ $75,000” (1%). Additionally, 41.1% stated that they were dating and never cohabitating, thirty-two.4% stated that these were cohabitating (living with one another), and you can 26.5% reported that these people were partnered.
The players into the lgbt relationships have been including mostly Eu-Western (70%; 14% African american, 10% Hispanic/Latino, 3% Western Western, 3% “other”). Players claimed private profits in selections: “ 0 indicates some level of frustration. The test–retest reliability for this measure could have been considered a beneficial [0.79; (33)], and that size has been found getting predictive validity [elizabeth.g., it is of lbs updates and you can diet practices various other adult products; (34, 35)].
Relationships Quality
The fresh new Marital Relations Survey [MIS; (36)] was applied to evaluate participants’ relationships top quality. Which fifteen-product scale contains two subscales out-of love and conflict. The brand new love size queried members having fun with ten things in addition to “Exactly how the amount of time do you really end up being to the your ex partner?” New dispute level queried participants using five issues and “How frequently might you as well as your partner dispute together?” For each and every items was ranked on an excellent 9-area Likert size regarding 0 = “not really” to 8 = “truly.” Facts determining dispute was reverse coded (for this reason evaluating “harmony”) and you will an entire ingredient rating of matchmaking high quality was computed. The original format of your MIS was created to evaluate partnered couples’ matchmaking top quality; the new measure are modified for this study to read “spouse” and you may “spouse,” in place of “spouse.” The fresh MIS is credible across the subsamples out-of partners (?s = 0.77–0.89) and has become utilized effectively in other education of same-sex lovers, discussing predictive validity [e.g., (19)].
Relationships Size
Professionals said the dating size by the answering: “For how almost a year could you be continuously associated with the personal lover?” Answers are presented in years to have convenient translation.
Covariates
Analyses experienced covariates most likely of putting on weight and matchmaking updates: decades, participants’ gender (coded ?1 = men, step 1 = female), and you can sexual direction. (Gender and you can sexual positioning along with was thought to be moderators inside the analyses).
Analytical Package
SPSS type twenty eight and you may HLM adaptation eight were utilized to own descriptive analyses and to take to investigation tries. Study had been seemed to possess completeness; the amount of lost research to the any varying used in analyses ranged regarding 0 to 1.4%. Listwise removal was applied getting forgotten investigation. So you’re able to make up the brand new low-versatility of information from someone nested in this relationship, multilevel modeling was applied to evaluate getting gender and you will sexual positioning variations in inside-people details in order to try research aims (37). Continued details was classification imply centered at top 1 (within-couples) and you may grand mean dependent during the peak 2 (between-couples).
